10.65441 The Relationship Between the Legislative and Executive Establishments in Denmark
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Danish Constitution of 1953, in force, stipulates in its first articles that the form of government in the country is a constitutional monarchy, and royal powers are inherited by men and women in accordance with the provisions of the law. The Danish political system is based on the principle of balance and flexible separation between the three institutions (executive, legislative, and judicial). The Danish Constitution defines the tasks and functions of these institutions, such that each institution performs its duties without interfering with the tasks of the other institutions. The relationship between them is participatory, based on balance and integration. The Prime Minister is usually the leader of the majority party or coalition, the head of government, and the head of the Council of Ministers. He is responsible to the unicameral parliament. Therefore, the legislative institution plays an important role in imparting a democratic character to the Danish political system and legitimizing the decisions taken by this system. The executive institution occupies a prestigious position, given that the King assumes the throne by inheritance, and his presidency is not specified, so he monopolizes it until his death.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. The Danish Constitution of 1953.
2. Muhammad Al-Khaqani (undated). The Role of Danish Foreign Policy in Iraq.
3. Muhammad Abdul Karim Maghlaj (2022). The Judicial System of the International Criminal Court: A Comparative Analytical Study. Arab Open Academy in Denmark.
4. Rawabet Center for Strategic Studies (2024). The Danish Government Prepares Its Citizens for War.
5. Monte Carlo International (2022). Denmark: The World's First Political Party Entirely Run by Artificial Intelligence.
6. Changes in Immigration Policies in Sweden and Denmark: What Are Their Impacts? (2023). Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/ar/.
7. Leyla Nezerević (2023). Danish Elections: New Parties Draw the Roadmap. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/ar/Second, English language sources
Adawy, M. (2023). "The effects of COVID-19 vaccination strategies on vaccine uptake in the Nordic Countries. A scoping review.". 'UiT The Arctic University of Norway'. . https://core.ac.uk/download/573317798.pdf.
1.Altavilla, C. (2020). "Comparing Fiscal (De)Centralization and Multilevel Governments in Different Institutional Settings:. A comparative study of Argentina and Denmark (2000-2010). European Diversity and Autonomy Papers EDAP 02/2020". https://cor.
2.Ansell, C. &. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 543‒571.
3.Bevir, M. (2009). Enabling state. In Key concepts in governance: Sage.
4.Commission, E. (2019). President von der Leyen’s mission letter to Margrethe Vestager. Brussels, .
5.Emerson, K. &. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes.. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
6.Gilbert N., &. G. (1999). The enabling state: Modern welfare capitalism in America. . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.Government, D. (2020). A green and sustainable world: The Danish government’s long-term strategy for global climate action. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and the Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities.
8.IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, & A. Pirani (eds), Global Warming of 1.5°C. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.
9.Monarchy, T. D. (2014). The Monarchy in Denmark.
10.Nations, U. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from http:l. //www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/sustainable/un-adopts-new-global-goals.htm.
11.Pedersen, K. M. (2020). "Reforming decentralized integrated health care systems: Theory and the case of the Norwegian reform". https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6457412.pdf.
12.Pollitt, C. &. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New Public Management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.Schmidt, T. D. (n.d.). "Incentive distortions in decentralized systems of governance – why is financing decentralized systems so difficult?". . https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7046416.pdf.
14.Slavinskaite, N. (2020). "Review of fiscal decentralization in European countries". International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences. . https://core.ac.uk/download/389070155.pdf.
15.Thorarensen, H. K. (2018). Concluding Thoughts,” in The Nordic Constitutions: A Comparative and. Oxford: Hart .
16.Thorarensenو, H. K. (n.d.).
17.Trond Norén Isaksen. (2014). he Prince Who Would Be King: Henrik of Denmark’s Struggle for Recognition,” in. New York: Palgrave.